Washington D.C., Jun 8, 2016 / 03:42 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review the death sentence of a man whom lawyers claim is intellectually disabled, in a case that could decide how states administer the death penalty.
“We welcome the Supreme Court's decision to review the standard Texas has been wrongfully using to determine intellectual disability and eligibility for execution,” said Karen Clifton, executive director of the Catholic Mobilizing Network. The organization is working with the U.S. bishops’ conference to end the use of the death penalty in the U.S.
“It is important to protect the most vulnerable from this type of punishment but we look forward to the day when the death penalty is declared unconstitutional once and for all,” Clifton continued.
The case, Moore v. Texas, is a challenge to the death sentence of Bobby James Moore, convicted in 1980 of robbing a grocery store and killing an employee, and convicted again in 2001 on a retrial. His lawyers say he is intellectually disabled by today’s medical standards.
The Supreme Court, in its 2002 decision Atkins v. Virginia, had ruled that the death penalty for mentally retarded persons violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. However, the Court left the question of determining a convict’s intellectual capacity up to the states.
Moore won in a state habeas court, which found that he was intellectually disabled and therefore unfit for the death penalty.
However, Texas’ criminal appeals court then ruled that he should be judged by the medical standards of when he had been sentenced in his 2001 retrial, since the state’s legislature had not mandated that more recent guidelines be followed. Texas had followed 1992 standards from the then-American Association of Mental Retardation, by which Moore was deemed fit for the death penalty.
In their petition for the Supreme Court to hear the case, Moore’s lawyers claimed that “applicable medical standards for diagnosing intellectual disability have changed since that time.”
They cited a state habeas court that in 2014 had determined that his “mean fullscale IQ score of 70.66 is within the range of mild mental retardation as recognized by the American Association on Mental Retardation.” They added that “review is necessary to ensure that Moore – and many others like him – are not unlawfully executed.”
According to Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, Moore’s case is not an isolated one.
“There’s no question that states continue to execute people who have intellectual disability. It’s unconstitutional to do so, but they continue to do so,” he told CNA.
Some states have controversial methods of determining a criminal’s intellectual capacity, according to the Catholic Mobilizing Network. Louisiana relies on elected judges to ultimately determine the question. States like Texas and Florida do not abide by the most recent medical standards to deem someone unfit for the death penalty.
Georgia made headlines for multiple recent executions of men whom lawyers claimed had IQs of around 70, the threshold for determining mental retardation. The state also executed a Vietnam War veteran in 2015 who reportedly had PTSD. Georgia is the only state to require defendants to “prove ‘mental retardation’ beyond a reasonable doubt,” according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
In Hall v. Florida in 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the Florida Supreme Court, after it decided that someone with an IQ of 71 – one point above the threshold for mental retardation – could be eligible for the death penalty.
The problem, Dunham said, is that there are three “prongs” used to determine one’s capacity, and IQ score is only part of the process. Furthermore, he added, someone’s IQ score is a “range” and not an exact determination. Studies have shown that various factors can affect the IQ score on tests, particularly those that have been in use for a while.
“When the IQ score can be the difference between life and death, setting 70 as an IQ cutoff will make it so that some people will not be diagnosed with intellectual disability simply because the year in which they took the test,” Dunham said.
In their amicus brief for the 2000 death penalty case McCarver v. State of North Carolina, the United States Catholic Conference quoted from the Texas Catholic bishops, who in 1999 had spoken out against the death penalty, but specifically the execution of the intellectually disabled.
“Mentally retarded persons by definition have sub-average intellectual functioning with concurrent deficits in socially adaptive behavior,” the bishops stated. “That is not to say such persons cannot tell right from wrong or should not be held responsible for criminal behavior. However, the death penalty is the most extreme sanction available to the state, and is therefore reserved for offenders who have the highest degree of blameworthiness for an extraordinarily aggravated crime.”
“How can an individual who by definition is significantly intellectually impaired ever meet the highest standard of blame required for such a penalty?” they asked.
Article Archive
Death penalty under fire as Supreme Court takes disabled man case
Related Articles • More Articles
Pope Francis prays during his Wednesday general audience in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican on April 24, 2024. / Credit: Vatican MediaACI Prensa Staff, Apr 25, 2024 / 16:10 pm (CNA).Asked during a new interview if he has any message for Vladimir Putin, the Russian president who instigated the war in Ukraine, Pope Francis stated that "a negotiated peace is better than an endless war."CBS News broadcast some excerpts April 24 from a new interview conducted by journalist Norah O'Donnell with Pope Francis at St. Martha House, the pontiff's residence in the Vatican.During the exchange, the full version of which will be released on May 19, the Holy Father reflected on world conflicts and especially on the suffering of children during wars.O'Donnell asked the Holy Father if he had any message for Vladimir Putin regarding Ukraine, to which the pontiff replied: "Please, countries at war, all of them... Stop the war. Seek to negotiate. Seek peace. A negotiated peace is better than an e...
An aerial view of Washington Square in San Francisco on May 22, 2020. / Credit: JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty ImagesCNA Staff, Apr 25, 2024 / 16:45 pm (CNA).San Francisco police arrested a homeless man last Sunday for allegedly stabbing a parent from a nearby Catholic school after an altercation involving the two outside a historic Catholic church in the city. Twenty-five-year-old Marko Asaulyuk of San Francisco was charged with attempted murder and eight counts of assault with a deadly weapon.The Catholic school father, who was released from the hospital Sunday, only suffered a minor injury to his leg, Father Tho Bui, pastor of Sts. Peter and Paul Church, told CNA Thursday in an email.San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone was conferring the sacrament of confirmation on the parish school's students and students from a nearby parish during a noon Mass when a "disruptive man" entered the church, as Bui described him.The man was walking up and down the main aisle of the ...
The pro-life flag from the Pro-Life Flag Project (www.prolifeflag.com). / Credit: Pro-Life Flag Project (www.prolifeflag.com)Toronto, Canada, Apr 25, 2024 / 12:50 pm (CNA).The International Pro-Life Flag will not fly over Toronto Catholic schools this May.Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) trustees voted against an April 23 motion proposed by trustee Michael Del Grande that the pro-life flag fly outside all schools and the Catholic Education Centre during the month of May, just as the board voted to fly the Pride flag in June.Del Grande's motion was defeated at the April 23 board meeting when only Garry Tanuan supported Del Grande's motion. The eight other board members in attendance and the two student trustees opposed his proposal.Though Del Grande could not muster enough backing from his colleagues, his plan, which would have also directed all TCDSB schools to teach an exclusively pro-life curriculum on May 9, the day of the National March for Life, garnered bois...