Atlanta, Ga., Mar 30, 2016 / 11:35 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Following the Georgia governor’s recent veto of a religious liberty bill, the state’s Catholic bishops are calling for further debate and dialogue on the issue.
“We fervently support religious liberty guaranteed by the United States and Georgia constitutions and we respect those who seek to enhance those freedoms through legislation,” said Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Atlanta and Bishop Gregory Hartmayer of Savannah.
The governor’s veto means that debate will continue, the bishops said in a March 29 statement. They encouraged respect for the “worthy motivations” of people on both sides of the debate.
The state’s Catholic bishops did not take an explicit stand for or against the legislation. Instead they commented more broadly, “While we and the other Catholic bishops in the United States support the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), we do not support any implementation of RFRA in a way that will discriminate against any individual.”
Archbishop Gregory and Bishop Hartmayer stressed the importance of religious liberty, rooted in the dignity of each human person.
Georgia Governor Nathan Deal, a Republican, vetoed House Bill 757 on Monday.
The bill would have protected some faith-based organizations like churches and religious schools or associations from being forced to compromise the tenets of their faith through various means. It would have protected them from being required to employ people whose beliefs or practices are not in accord with the organizations’ religious beliefs.
It would also have protected religious officials from being required to perform marriage ceremonies by state law, as well as protecting organizations from being forced to rent facilities or allow them to be used for events that violate their “sincerely held religious belief.”
Gov. Deal said the bill does not reflect Georgia’s image as a state of “warm, friendly people.” While backers of the bill cited violations of religious liberty in other states, he said these were not relevant to Georgia, whose law does not recognize sexual orientation as a protected class.
Deal also said he rejected “threats” from some businesses opposed to the bill.
Opponents of the bill included LGBT activist groups and major corporations like Disney, Apple and Intel that threatened economic retaliation against the state if it passed the bill. The NFL and the NCAA warned that the passage of the bill could influence their decisions about holding sports championships in the state.
Ryan T. Anderson, a writer on marriage and religious liberty topics based at the Heritage Foundation, criticized the governor’s veto. He charged that the governor “caved to pressure from big business and special interests.”
“This shows the lack of courage of many in the political class, and it also highlights the extreme nature of the left and the business community. To these groups, even mild religious liberty protections are unacceptable,” Anderson said in a March 28 commentary at The Daily Signal.
Anderson said the revised bill was “very modest” and may not in fact provide any protection for religious freedom from new or existing laws that protect sexual orientation and gender identity.
He said the vetoed bill had a narrow definition of religious organizations and its lack of protections for bakers, florists, or wedding industry professionals who cannot cooperate in the celebration of a same-sex union for religious reasons.
Anderson called for strong religious freedom protections.
“America is in a time of transition,” he said, citing the redefinition of marriage in the courts and changing beliefs about human sexuality. “During this time, it is critical to protect the right to disagree and the civil liberties of those who speak and act in accord with what Americans had always believed about marriage – that it is the union of husband and wife.”
Photo credit: Rob Hainer via www.shutterstock.com.
Article Archive
Georgia bishops: religious freedom bill veto a chance for more debate
Related Articles • More Articles
The state capitol building of New Hampshire in Concord, New Hampshire. / Credit: Michael M. Santiago/Getty ImagesCNA Newsroom, Mar 28, 2024 / 11:30 am (CNA).The New Hampshire House of Representatives is poised to reconsider its narrow passage of a bill that would legalize assisted suicide in the "Live Free or Die" state.Last week, New Hampshire state representatives passed HB 1273 by a margin of just three votes, 179-176. Twenty-four representatives abstained during the vote. However, the bill has not been advanced to the New Hampshire Senate, as one member of the slim majority, Rep. Mike Ouellet, filed a motion to reconsider. The Republican politician had initially voted in favor of the proposed law. However, the following day, Ouellet revealed that he wanted to change his vote due to his faith."I've been a practicing Catholic my whole life," the lawmaker told the New Hampshire Center for Public Interest Journalism. The Republican politician felt "torn because the bill w...
Adoration. / Thoom / Shutterstock.CNA Staff, Mar 28, 2024 / 07:00 am (CNA).Did you know that it is possible to sing a special song of adoration on Holy Thursday and have your soul purified?It's true, and the song is "Tantum Ergo."First, some background...A plenary indulgence is a grace granted by the Catholic Church through the merits of Jesus Christ to remove all temporal punishment due to sin.What does this mean?"An indulgence does not confer grace. An indulgence is not a remission of the guilt due to sin. The guilt due to sin is ordinarily taken away by the sacraments of baptism and penance (confession), in which we receive forgiveness for sins through Jesus Christ," the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) explains in this helpful Q&A."Although guilt is taken away, and with it the eternal penalty that is due to sin, namely, damnation, the eternal loss of the presence of God, there remain consequences for sins that those who have committed them ...
Asian elephant. / Credit: Filiz Elaerts / Unsplash (CC0)CNA Newsroom, Mar 27, 2024 / 13:00 pm (CNA).Despite repeated protests from Catholic bishops, wildlife attacks continue to pose a severe threat to the lives and properties of both Catholics and other residents in the Southern Indian state of Kerala. On Wednesday, local media reported significant damage from two elephants in Kerala's Idukki district, alongside a tiger's attack on livestock. This year alone, elephant attacks have resulted in 27 fatalities in the region. Video footage of a Catholic man trampled to death on Feb. 10 made headlines and sparked protests, only to be followed by news of a potential mauling by a tiger of a Catholic woman on her way to Mass four days after the fatal attack. Further fatal elephant tramplings followed the incident.The Catholic Church in Kerala has been leading the charge in urging the government to take decisive action to protect human lives. "The series of shocking ...